|
|
June Bugs of a Different Kind By Robert Winkler
The U.S. Geological Survey’s Patuxent Wildlife Research Center oversees the Breeding Bird Survey from its Laurel, Maryland headquarters. BBS methodology has its limitations—roadside observations do not adequately measure population trends in endangered, nocturnal, and colonial-nesting birds. Moreover, sections of road that pass natural areas—including the strips of vegetation often left as buffers between the road and cleared land—can give false impressions. Species may be common along these sections but absent in nearby areas where habitat has been destroyed. Despite the “roadside bias” issue, which Patuxent officials are addressing, the more than 30 years of BBS data collectively provide valuable insight into state, regional, and continental population trends of about 500 species of North American birds. BBS results have helped focus public attention on worrisome changes in bird populations, such as the decline of the cerulean warbler, the eastern towhee, the red-headed woodpecker, and the grassland birds east of the Mississippi River. The news isn’t all bad. Eastern bluebird numbers, for example, increased more than three percent a year between 1980 and 2001, according to the BBS. The decline of this species, which nests in old woodpecker holes and in tree cavities formed by natural decay, was noted long before the first multi-state BBS in 1966. Eastern bluebirds thrive in sparsely wooded habitats: forest clearings, beaver ponds, meadows, and farmland. To feed, they fly from perches and catch insects on or near the ground. Their nesting cavities are often in dead, isolated trees. Early in the 20th century, the open habitats the bluebird requires were reverting to forest. Meanwhile, commercial and residential developers, and managers of timberlands, were removing the bluebird’s existing nest sites. Dead trees were regarded as unsightly, and their wildlife value wasn’t appreciated. Competition from the house sparrow and the starling—aggressive cavity nesters introduced from Europe in the 1800s—and pesticide poisoning in the 1950s and 1960s worsened the bluebird’s plight. In the 1930s, the bluebird’s early advocates were promoting “bluebird trails”—a series of nestboxes weaving through appropriate habitat—but it wasn’t until the 1970s that bluebird restoration on a massive scale took hold. Today, The North American Bluebird Society—dedicated to helping Eastern, Western, and mountain bluebirds, as well as other native cavity nesters—has more than 4,000 members, and its Transcontinental Bluebird Trail comprises more than 20,000 nestboxes. There are also a number of state and province bluebird societies, and on the Internet, there’s The Birdhouse Network, a nestbox-monitoring project of the Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology. The Birdhouse Network maintains data on more than 30 species of cavity nesters, displays pictures from nestbox cameras, and sponsors “citizen science” research. Like BBS volunteers, bluebird society members and Birdhouse Network participants are especially busy in June, monitoring nestboxes at the height of the breeding season. More than 100,000 nestboxes are sold annually, and do-it-yourselfers build countless others. Eastern bluebirds have also benefited in recent decades from the comeback of the beaver, which builds dams that flood riparian woodlands. Beaver ponds often contain dead, hole-ridden trees. Installing a bluebird nestbox is not a project to take lightly. You don’t just nail a nestbox to a tree and forget about it—that would be tantamount to serving predators a bluebird platter. If your nestbox doesn’t meet specifications, if it’s not a safe haven, if you choose the wrong site, and if you don’t monitor the box for problems, birds are far less likely to survive and to nest successfully, if any move in. The Bluebird Monitor’s Guide by Cynthia Berger et al. and The Backyard Birdhouse Book by René and Christyna M. Laubach are among the books that will steer you in the right direction. Aside from commitment, an avian housing program may require a significant outlay of cash, especially if you’re mechanically challenged like me. For my store-bought bluebird nestbox, metal mounting pole, stovepipe-style raccoon guard, and attachment hardware, I paid over $90—more than three times what Henry Thoreau paid to construct his cabin on Walden Pond. My building materials, furthermore, were harder to find.
Of course, predation, accidents, and disease are natural in the wild, and if you spend time helping wildlife, you’re bound to experience tragic losses, as I did in early May. My nestbox attracted a tree swallow—a species that often uses boxes designed for bluebirds. The swallow spent most of two days resting inside the box. Once, when I opened the hinged front panel, it flew out, skimmed the surface of a nearby pond for a drink, and circled higher to catch flying insects. I thought it was okay, perhaps waiting for the arrival of a mate, but when I checked the box on the third day, the swallow lay dead inside, with no visible injuries. The mysterious circumstances of the death disturbed me but gave me no reason to abandon my project. After cleaning the box, I put it back up, and though bluebirds inspected it, a pair of tree swallows moved in. Tree swallows seem less common in my neighborhood than bluebirds, so I’m thrilled. Right now, the female swallow is in the box, brooding
the clutch of eggs in her feather-lined nest. The male stands guard on a
snag curving over the pond. Sometimes they zoom around together, showing
their incredible flying skill as they pick off insects. If my curiosity
brings me too close to the nestbox when the protective female is outside,
she dives at me while calling aggressively. I respect her wishes: I turn
from her nestbox and head toward my own. Text and photo ("Tree Swallow at Nestbox") Copyright
© 2002 Robert Winkler |